BlueHost is a better web hosting choice than Fatcow compared the web hosting reputation, features, performance, reliability, technical support and price, based on our editors’ real hosting experience with both BlueHost and Fatcow for a whole year.
We have been monitoring our sites hosted with on the shared platform of the 2 companies for a long time. Besides, we have browsed a pile of customer reviews on the Internet to learn the real voice of other customers. See the ratings of their services in the following comparison table.
|Plan In Comparison||BlueHost||FatCow|
|How to Claim||Link Activation||Link Activation|
BlueHost, has devoted into Linux-based web hosting service for personal and small businesses since 1996. As one of the largest and most historical web hosting companies, BlueHost created several business miracles in the industry. BlueHost is the only web hosting company that only offers a single all-in-one web hosting package named BlueHost Professional in the past 16 years, but has over 2 million existing customers and 3 dedicated data centers that invested with over 20 million USD from 2010 by themselves.
FatCow, founded in 1997, offers a budget single all-in-one web hosting package as BlueHost, but more focusing on providing a simple website build solution for their customers to quickly start websites over the Internet. With the narrow marketing positioning, FatCow didn’t grow as strong as BlueHost in the recent 10 years. Now FatCow is still a medium sized web hosting company serving for approximately 120,000 customers worldwide.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Industry Reputation
BlueHost is better well-known than Fatcow in the communities and web hosting marketplace. By the over 5 years’ consistent partnership with open source communities, today BlueHost has become one of the best web hosting choice for many open source projects. E.G. BlueHost is one of the Top 10 Web Hosting recommended for WordPress by WordPress.org, and the best choice for Drupal by Drupal.org.
Furthermore, BestHostingSearch, the sister site of HowsHosting.com designed for web hosting ranking based on the verified customer reviews, has collected 139 reviews from the BlueHost verified customers. Based on the BlueHost review statistics, the 99.3% of customers were satisfied with the BlueHost overall web hosting service, the 99.3% were satisfied with the BlueHost web hosting performance & reliability, the 97.8% were satisfied with the BlueHost web hosting software & control panel, and the 97.1% were satisfied with the BlueHost technical support.
Essentially, BlueHost is the best customer satisfied web hosting company that our editors have reviewed so far.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Ease of Use
Both web hosts give you the functionality you need to build your website in an easy way. With the free website builder, you can create a professional-looking website and start your online presence effortlessly. There are a wide range of dynamic themes and templates inside the site building tools. During the process, no programming or HTML experience is needed.
Control panel, just like command center, has a direct influence on website management. BlueHost integrates the most popular control panel -cPanel- with all the plans while Fatcow works with vDeck control panel. To be honest, the control panel of Fatcow cannot compare with that of BlueHost. Anyway, 1-click installer is included with the control panel so that you can add a variety of applications to your website from one place.
Judging from the ease of use, BlueHost is the winner with the provision of cPanel control panel.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Features
As designed to help customers start websites by using their own website builder program, Fatcow actually doesn’t support the latest cutting-edge technology as well as BlueHost. Fatcow doesn’t support Ruby on Rails, Python, Perl, Shell (SSH) Access, FastCGI, CronJobs, etc. Particularly, without CronJobs, almost all the popular content management systems cannot be driven successfully. Take an example. WordPress, Drupal and Joomla all need the support of CronJobs to create the sitemap schedularly.
With BlueHost offering a premium website builder recently, based on the following comparison for BlueHost VS Fatcow, it’s easy to know that BlueHost is much more rich-featured than Fatcow.
|Plan In Comparison||Starter||FatCow Plan|
|Control Panel||cPanel (Customized)||vDesk|
|PHP||5.4||5.2.x (Not Up-To-Date)|
|Ruby on Rails|
|Shell (SSH) Access|
|Go BlueHost||Not Recommended|
Besides, compared Fatcow offering most things in common, BlueHost is the only web hosting provider that customized Linux kernel for the reliable web hosting services. They invested over a million USD to develop out CPU Segregation Technology that can segregate CPU, memory and disk I/O of every shared server for every user for the guaranteed server resources. This significantly increases the reliability, performance and security of their customer sites and data. Watch the following video to learn more about the technology at BlueHost.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Technical Support
BlueHost and Fatcow offer 24×7 technical support via toll-free telephone, live chat and e-mail. Fatcow guarantees any support requests via phone or live chat can be answered in less than 2 minutes on average, but BlueHost guarantees with the holding times that average under 30 seconds and 100% on-site/in-house staff, the customer is assured to be helped with the people who know how to help.
Based on our editors’ true hosting experience with BlueHost and Fatcow in the recent year, the technical support were both responsive, but we thought BlueHost technical support is better helpful for the technical problems. Some Fatcow support staffs are lack of technical knowledge and more focusing on helping the users who are using their website builder program.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Performance & Reliability
To compare these two web hosts for the aspects of hosting performance and uptime in an objective manner, we have finished two tasks. One is to search the information for the data center infrastructure and web servers adopted by them, and the other one is to carry out the real-world monitoring for getting the precise statistics of their hosting speed and uptime track record.
As for the first task, we have to admit that both of these two web hosts have paid much attention.
- BlueHost utilizes their self-designed server machines that come with the 256 GB of overall memory, 2.4GHz processing speed, 64 TB of server capacity, SSD based database storage, advanced Apache, CentOS 6 operating system and many more. In addition, this web host has set up their self-owned data centers that are equipped with a series of advanced facilities and infrastructures to achieve the uninterrupted working of these machines, such as 24/7 video monitoring, raised floor, fire suppression, climate control and UPS units.
- FatCow has two data centers that are located in Boston that occupy more than 2.400 sq.ft in total and locate thousands of web servers. In addition, they adopt the secure and solid network infrastructure that comes with the pooled server environment and the redundant routers via BGP providers, all are aiming to prevent downtime and slow speed effectively.
As for the online testing, we have set up two identical websites that are WordPress based and are coming with the same content. After getting them hosted by BlueHost and FatCow respectively, we have started the monitoring using Uptime Robot since the middle of the last year. According to the result, we have found that BkueHost ensures us a 100% uptime track record with no downtime at all.
As for FatCow, this web host achieves a 99.95% uptime during the past months.
In addition to the uptime, BlueHost also wins over FatCow for the hosting speed. Check the detailed statistics in the following.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Price
As the different marketing positioning, Fatcow is pricing higher than BlueHost. Fatcow web hosting is starting at $12.95/mo regularly, but usually they provide a huge discount for $4.08/mo for signup. BlueHost web hosting is starting at $7.99/mo regularly, but now they’re offering a special 63% discount for $2.95/mo for all visitors going through this BlueHost promotional link.
|Plan In Comparison||Starter||FatCow Plan|
|Discount||63% Off||68% Off|
|How to Claim||Link Activation||Link Activation|
The trick of Fatcow pricing is that they attract customers by offering a huge discount for the first order, then charge the customers at an expensive price up to $12.95/mo for the renewal. At that time, as many customers using Fatcow website builder, they cannot transfer the sites elsewhere and they have to accept the unreasonable price.
Compared to Fatcow, BlueHost charges renewal for $7.99/mo that is reasonable and affordable in the marketplace. In addition, the BlueHost offers much more options for users to build up their websites. If a customer cannot accept the more expensive renewal price, (s)he can choose to transfer elsewhere. BlueHost attracts their customers by the outstanding web hosting service truly.
BlueHost VS Fatcow > Conclusion
Fatcow is cheaper than BlueHost for the first order, but BlueHost is a much better choice that makes over 2 million customers happy today. If you’re looking for a trouble-free web hosting service, BlueHost is the best choice. With the BlueHost ANYTIME money back guarantee, your purchase with BlueHost is absolutely risk-free and worry-free.
To learn more information about BlueHost, visit http://www.bluehost.com/